MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2807014630 · doi:10.1680/jenhh.18.00002

Life safety in heritage structures in Canada

2018· article· en· W2807014630 on OpenAlexaffabout
Luke Morrison, Lyle Hamre

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering History and Heritage · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCassava research and cyanide
Canadian institutionsPublic Safety Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectural engineeringCultural heritageIndustrial heritageSubject (documents)Environmental planningEngineeringEnvironmental resource managementForensic engineeringBusinessRisk analysis (engineering)Cultural heritage managementComputer sciencePolitical scienceGeographyLawEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heritage structures are landmarks in a community and form a connection to its history and culture. As a structure’s life extends, it is renovated and is subject to physical changes and to changes in occupancy. When these changes occur, building regulations are applied that require meeting current life safety criteria. Attempts to comply with modern regulations have, in many cases, proved costly and resulted in the loss of heritage features that the owner may want to preserve. Therefore, application of fire safety regulations for heritage structures requires special treatment and has two main objectives – life safety and historic conservation. This paper focuses on the processes and tools that engineers employ to demonstrate acceptable life safety in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering History and HeritageSame topicCassava research and cyanideFrench-language works237,207