An Exploratory Study of Ethnic Differences in Parent Cultural Socialization Practices and Children’s Experiences of Peer Ethnic Victimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research suggests that visible ethnic minority parents engage in cultural socialization practices and that visible ethnic minority children experience peer ethnic victimization more often than ethnic majority Caucasian children. Limited research has assessed ethnic differences in the construct validity and psychometric properties of measures assessing parent cultural socialization practices and peer ethnic victimization. This study examines ethnic differences in the construct validity and psychometric properties (reliabilities, mean levels) of these measures and in the associations between these constructs. Participants included 439 kindergarten to third-grade children and 275 of their parents from diverse ethnic groups. The constructs showed adequate construct validity across the overall visible ethnic minority and ethnic majority Caucasian groups. However, reliability was low at some waves for some ethnic groups. Relative to other ethnic groups, Southeast/East and West/South Asian parents engaged in more frequent cultural socialization practices and Black/African Canadian children experienced higher levels of peer ethnic victimization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".