Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analizamos los componentes normativos que regulan la visión y la mirada en un vestuario y una sauna de hombres de un gimnasio mixto. Lejos de ser un acto espontáneo, libre y reflejo, la visión está sometida a un proceso institucionalizado de género. Focalizamos la atención en la sauna porque introduce un aspecto particularmente relevante en la construcción de los mandatos de género de las corporalidades hegemónicas y disidentes, en este caso masculinas. Qué se puede ver y qué no, cómo se ve y qué se enseña de las corporalidades desnudas. En dicho espacio funciona de modo inverso el mecanismo del vestir. Si en la vida cotidiana lo que cubrimos es para poder hacer visible lo que no puede ser visto, en la sauna enseñamos lo que no debe ser visto. Ello nos permite evidenciar de forma explícita los límites de dichos mandatos de género, su actuación y su vínculo con el deseo y el placer. Los materiales empíricos provienen del estudio autoetnográfco «La producción social y de género de los sentidos. El caso de un gimnasio».Palabras clave: corporalidad, vestuario, heteronormatividad, masculinidades, disidencia. AbstractWe analyze the normative components that regulate the vision and the look, in a men’s sauna (of a mixed gym). Far from being a spontaneous act, free and reflex, the vision is subject to an institutionalized process of gender. We focus attention on a sauna because it introduces a particularly relevant aspect in the construction of the gender mandates of hegemonic and dissident masculinities bodies. What can be seen and what is not, how it is seen and what is taught of the naked bodies. In this space, the mechanism of dressing operates inversely. If in everyday life what we cover is to be able to make visible what cannot be seen,in the sauna we teach what should not be seen. This allows us to explicitly highlight the limits of these gender mandates, their performance and their link with desire and pleasure. The empirical materials come from the auto ethnographic research «The social and gender production of senses. The Case of a Gym».Keywords: Embodiment, Changing Room, Heteronormativity, Masculinities, Dissidence
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".