MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2807102130

유아교사양성과정에서의 Service-Learning 적용에 관한 연구

2018· article· ko· W2807102130 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
한선아

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly childhood education · 2018
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicService-Learning and Community Engagement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsService (business)Service-learningComputer scienceBusinessPsychologyPedagogyMarketing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

본 연구에서는 최근 대학의 사회봉사 기능을 재인식하고 대학교육에 봉사활동을 접목하려는 시도가 확대되는 가운데 Service-Learning을 유아교사양성과정에 적용하는 방안을 탐색하였다. Service-Learning의 선행이론 분석을 통해 나타난 교수학습방법적 특성과 유아교사양성과정의 핵심인 실천적 지식 함양을 근거로, 봉사와 학습을 동시에 추구하며 학습자-교수자-지역사회의 균형 있는 수혜가 될 수 있도록 하는 단계별 절차를 고안하였다. 또한 이 절차를 유아사회교육 교과목에 적용하여 대학 내 학습과 지역사회 봉사활동을 병행함으로써 Service-Learning이 예비유아교사의 교수능력을 증진하는데 적절한 방식이 될 수 있도록 하는 하나의 방안을 제시하였다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.012
Scholarly communication0.0110.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarly childhood educationSame topicService-Learning and Community EngagementFrench-language works237,207