MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2807122255 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2018.2824318

A <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${D}$ </tex-math> </inline-formula>-Band Digital Transmitter with 64-QAM and OFDM Free-Space Constellation Formation

2018· article· en· W2807122255 on OpenAlexaff
Stefan Shopov, Ozan Dogan Gurbuz, Gabriel M. Rebeiz, Sorin P. Voinigescu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmitterMathematicsQAMOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingSpace (punctuation)Quadrature amplitude modulationTelecommunicationsComputer scienceAlgorithmBit error rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A D-band I/Q RF-DAC featuring two 6-bit DAC elements driven in quadrature, each with its own on-die antenna, and a total effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) of 13.2 dBm, is demonstrated in a 45-nm SOI-CMOS technology. The carrier signal is first amplified by the 30-dB gain LO path and is directly modulated by the 12 baseband bit streams, without linear upconversion or power amplification. QPSK, 8-PSK, 16-QAM, 32-QAM, and 64-QAM single-carrier (SC) and OFDM constellations are formed in free space and measured above the die at data rates up to 12 Gb/s and at distances over 15 cm. The large-signal bandwidth -from the carrier input pad to the output of the transmitter above the antennas- is 130-142 GHz and was obtained by sweeping the frequency of the D-band external carrier, modulating it on die at 0.4 Gb/s using 16-QAM format, and measuring the error vector magnitude (EVM) with an instrumentation receiver. The highest data rate of 12 Gb/s was measured for QPSK SC modulation with a corresponding EVM of -12.2 dB. Lower maximum data rates of 7 Gb/s with -14.3-dB EVM and 3.6 Gb/s with -19-dB EVM were observed for 16-QAM and 64-QAM formats, respectively. Spectral shaping and OFDM transmission were also demonstrated at up to 2.5 Gb/s. The prototype consumes a total of 1.25 W, with an energy efficiency of 104 pJ/b.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6950.450

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Solid-State CircuitsSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207