A brain-enriched Drp1 isoform associates with lysosomes, late endosomes, and the plasma membrane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) constricts mitochondria as a mechanochemical GTPase during mitochondrial division. The Drp1 gene contains several alternative exons and produces multiple isoforms through RNA splicing. Here we performed a systematic analysis of Drp1 transcripts in different mouse tissues and identified a previously uncharacterized isoform that is highly enriched in the brain. This Drp1 isoform is termed Drp1 ABCD because it contains four alterative exons: A, B, C, and D. Remarkably, Drp1 ABCD is located at lysosomes, late endosomes, and the plasma membrane in addition to mitochondria. Furthermore, Drp1 ABCD is concentrated at the interorganelle interface between mitochondria and lysosomes/late endosomes. The localizations of Drp1 ABCD at lysosomes, late endosomes, and the plasma membrane require two exons, A and B, that are present in the GTPase domain. Drp1 ABCD assembles onto these membranes in a manner that is regulated by its oligomerization and GTP hydrolysis. Experiments using lysosomal inhibitors show that the association of Drp1 ABCD with lysosomes/late endosomes depends on lysosomal pH but not their protease activities. Thus, Drp1 may connect mitochondria to endosomal–lysosomal pathways in addition to mitochondrial division.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".