Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parmi les victimes d’actes criminels avec violence commis au Canada, le quart subit des blessures physiques, le tiers a de fortes réactions de stress post-traumatique et une plus forte proportion encore vit de la confusion, de la frustration ou de la colère. Or, seulement 9 % de l’ensemble de ces victimes ont recours à des organismes formels d’aide. Il y a donc lieu de se demander, comme société, si nous répondons bien aux besoins des victimes de crimes avec violence. Proches, intervenants psychosociaux, personnel médical et acteurs du système judiciaire peuvent tous à leur manière contribuer à atténuer la souffrance des victimes. Diminuer la stigmatisation, accélérer la recherche d’aide, favoriser le dévoilement, défendre les droits et encourager la dénonciation comptent parmi les moyens à employer afin de diminuer le fardeau émotionnel, social et économique associé à la gravité de cette victimisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".