MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2807227206 · doi:10.3233/jifs-169637

Precise marketing of precision marketing value chain process on the H group line based on big data

2018· article· en· W2807227206 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDatabase transactionComputer scienceSubdivisionTransaction dataMarketing strategyProcess (computing)Product (mathematics)Database marketingBig dataBusinessDatabaseData miningMarketingMarketing managementRelationship marketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The frequent trading activities of electronic commerce make the online transaction volume of Chinese enterprises increase year by year, but many enterprises still follow the traditional marketing strategy, which is not conducive to the long-term development of enterprises. Online precision marketing system model based on big data was built, Hadoop + MapReduce precision marketing model platform was implemented, all the data were stored in a distributed storage system, data mining technology was used to deal with it and provide the basis for enterprise decision making. China’s H group was studied. The “user portrait database” and the corresponding E-R map were constructed. The height subdivision factor with strong correlation was selected for cluster analysis, and the product was subdivided by cluster analysis. This study has certain reference significance for the collection and mining of online data of enterprises in our country and contributes to the long-term healthy development of the enterprise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it