Programming of the Adult HPA Axis After Neonatal Separation and Environmental Stress in Male and Female Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maternal separation, hypoxia, and hypothermia are common stressors in the premature neonate. Using our rat model of human prematurity, we evaluated sexual dimorphisms in the long-term effects of these neonatal stressors on behavior of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in adult rats. Neonatal rats were exposed daily on postnatal days 2 to 6 to maternal separation with normoxia, with hypoxia allowing spontaneous hypothermia, with hypothermia per se, and with hypoxia while maintaining isothermia with external heat. The major findings were that (a) prior maternal-neonatal separation during the first week of postnatal life attenuated the plasma ACTH and corticosterone response to restraint stress in adult male but not female rats, (b) prior neonatal hypothermia augmented the plasma ACTH and corticosterone response to restraint stress in adult male rats, but not female rats, and (c) changes in hypothalamic, pituitary, and adrenal mRNA expression did not account for most of these HPA axis effects. Most of the programming effects on adult HPA axis was attributed to prior maternal-neonatal separation alone (with normoxia) because the addition of hypoxia with spontaneous hypothermia, hypothermia per se, and hypoxia while preventing hypothermia during maternal-neonatal separation had minimal effects on the HPA axis. These results may inform strategies to prevent sexually dimorphic sequelae of neonatal stress including those due to medical interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".