MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2807281644 · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2831785

Design Optimization of Multiple-Layer PSCs With Minimal Losses for Efficient and Robust Inductive Wireless Power Transfer

2018· article· en· W2807281644 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Power Transfer Systems
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersKing Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Electromagnetic coilTransmitterWireless power transferMaximum power transfer theoremEddy currentWirelessComputer scienceElectronic engineeringRadio frequencyInductive couplingElectrical engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)Power (physics)EngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inductive wireless Power Transfer (IPT) is a promising technology for remote powering of a wide variety of applications of electronic devices. To design IPT systems with the highest power transfer efficiency and the maximal robustness to coupling factor variations between transmitter and receiver of printed spiral coils (PSCs), high quality factors ( <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Q-Factor</i> ) of the utilized PSCs are required. Designing PSCs with high <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Q-Factor</i> is limited by the eddy current, the proximity effect, and parasitic losses. In this paper, PSC parasitic losses are carefully analyzed and specific design solutions are proposed. Genetic algorithm optimizations are developed to accommodate the proposed design solutions in minimizing losses. Single and multiple layer variable width PSCs are optimally designed with eddy current and proximity effect losses minimized. The designed PSCs are fabricated and experimental measurements are performed. The validity of the proposed approach to largely improve both IPT efficiency and robustness are confirmed. Using multiple coil layers, the robustness to axial and lateral coupling variations between coils is highly improved. For a triple-layer PSC design case, up to 3.5-fold improved robustness are obtained in reference to conventional IPT systems. Compared with the previous state of the art IPT topologies, the highest Figure-of-Merit value is obtained using the proposed design solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it