MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2807331033 · doi:10.5555/3213200.3213211

Simulating link aggregation in private virtual lan using openflow for cloud environment

2018· article· en· W2807331033 on OpenAlexaff
Damilola Murtala, Yasir Malik, Pavol Zavarsky

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications and Networking Symposium · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsConcordia University of Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkCloud computingOpenFlowSoftware-defined networkingLink layerPort (circuit theory)Distributed computingTelecommunications linkIsolation (microbiology)Virtual LANOperating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Segregation and isolation of mission critical devices and services are among the main security concerns in cloud computing environments. Private Virtual LAN (PVLAN) offers the ability to efficiently support segregation and isolation among end devices. Link aggregation on PVLAN promiscuous ports reduces the risk of single point of failure for the entire PVLAN network. This research focuses on improving security and availability of nodes within the PVLAN domain and layer three devices by combining multiple PVLAN promiscuous ports as a single logical port using Software Defined Networking protocols. Our approach enables cloud platform to implement PVLAN by incorporating link aggregation to extend and support PVLAN features for optimal load balancing and path selection of inbound and outbound traffic. It also helps to reduce network inefficiencies which might occur from multiple traffic utilizing a single communication uplink. Simulation results show the effectiveness of our approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications and Networking SymposiumSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207