MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2807332667 · doi:10.1149/ma2018-01/44/2611

Kinetics of Initial Stages of Pt Oxidation from Electrochemistry and Surface X-Ray Diffraction

2018· article· en· W2807332667 on OpenAlexaffabout
Natalie Stubb, Timo Fuchs, Martin Ruge, Olaf M. Magnussen, Jakub Drnec, David A. Harrington

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTafel equationOxideExchange current densityChemistryMonolayerAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Electrochemical kineticsElectrochemistryMaterials scienceCrystallographyElectrodePhysical chemistryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The kinetics of the electroxidation of Pt to Pt "oxide" have been studied for many years, initially on polycrystalline Pt. Early studies showed that the oxide charge increases linearly with log(time) at constant potential, the so-called direct logarithmic growth law. Later, Harrington showed empirically that the underlying differential equation, with a Tafel potential dependence of the rate constant, predicted also the current plateau behavior in cyclic voltammetry [1]. The Tafel dependence is suggestive of electron-transfer kinetics and was also found in the oxidation of Pt(111) [2]. Despite this, the classical Conway model [3] invokes field-driven dipole flipping, and other literature models invoke bulk film models that cannot be applicable for a few-monolayer-thick oxide. An early atomistic model stressed the role of surface diffusion in leading to irreversibility and predicted a three-layer surface restructuring and the direct logarithmic law, but with the wrong slope [4]. Our recent Surface X-ray Diffraction studies [5] have shown that the number of place-exchanged Pt atoms also follows the direct logarithmic law. We here extend this result to an extended data set that systematically steps into the oxide peak in the region 1-1.2 V vs RHE, which is the peak in which the place-exchange initiates. The intensity of the (1,1,1.5) reflection shows that the place-exchange process initiates in the early stages of this peak, earlier than the peak maximum at 1.05 V where it sharply changes in a 50 mV/s intensity voltammogram. There is a systematic change in the slope of the direct logarithmic law over the range of the peak, with the largest slope at the peak maximum. The observation that both the current and the number of place-exchanged Pt atoms obey the direct logarithmic law suggests a common limiting process, though in principle the place-exchange and electron-transfer processes need not be coupled. The oxidation of adsorbed OH to O has also been suggested to occur in the same peak and there is some evidence for two processes. A careful comparison of the current density with the coverage of place-exchanged atoms is undertaken here to deduce the electron/place-exchange ratio and indirectly the nature of the accompanying species (O or OH), as well as determining how tightly coupled the exchange and oxidation processes are. The issue of double-layer charging correction is a significant issue in this determination. The place exchange is the initial step of the irreversible nanoscale restructuring of the surface that occurs on potential cycling. The later stages have recently been quantified using Grazing-Incidence Small-Angle X-ray Scattering [6-7]. A careful study of the kinetics is directed toward a detailed atomistic understanding of the evolution of the surface structure. The authors thank the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for support. [1] D.L. Heyd, D.A. Harrington, J. Electroanal. Chem., 335, 19 (1992). [2] A. Björling, J.M. Feliu, J. Electroanal. Chem., 662, 17 (2011). [3] H. Angerstein-Kozlowska, B.E. Conway, K. Tellefsen, B. Barnett, Electrochim. Acta, 34, 1045 (1989). [4] D.A. Harrington, J. Electroanal. Chem., 420, 101 (1997). [5] J. Drnec, M. Ruge, F. Reikowski, B. Rahn, F. Carlà, R. Felici, J. Stettner, O.M. Magnussen, D.A. Harrington, Electrochim. Acta, 224, 220 (2017). [6] M. Ruge, J. Drnec, B. Rahn, F. Reikowski, D.A. Harrington, F. Carlà, R. Felici, J. Stettner, O.M. Magnussen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 139, 4532 (2017). [7] M. Ruge, J. Drnec, B. Rahn, F. Reikowski, D.A. Harrington, F. Carla, R. Felici, J. Stettner, O.M. Magnussen, J. Electrochem. Soc., 164, H608 (2017).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion→French-language works237,207→