Characterization of influenza B virus variants with reduced neuraminidase inhibitor susceptibility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Treatment options for influenza B virus infections are limited to neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) which block the neuraminidase (NA) glycoprotein on the virion surface. The development of NAI resistance would therefore result in a loss of antiviral treatment options for influenza B infections. This study characterized two contemporary influenza B viruses with known resistance-conferring NA amino acid substitutions, D197N and H273Y, detected during routine surveillance. The D197N and H273Y variants were characterized in vitro by assessing NA enzyme activity and affinity, as well as replication in cell culture compared to NAI-sensitive wild-type viruses. In vivo studies were also performed in ferrets to assess the replication and transmissibility of each variant. Mathematical models were used to analyse within-host and between-host fitness of variants relative to wild-type viruses. The data revealed that the H273Y variant had similar NA enzyme function relative to its wild-type but had slightly reduced replication and transmission efficiency in vivo . The D197N variant had impaired NA enzyme function but there was no evidence of reduction in replication or transmission efficiency in ferrets. Our data suggest that the influenza B variant with H273Y NA substitution had a more notable reduction in fitness compared to wild-type viruses than the influenza B variant with the D197N NA substitution. Although a D197N variant is yet to become widespread, it is the most commonly detected NAI-resistant influenza B virus in surveillance studies. Our results highlight the need to carefully monitor circulating viruses for the spread of influenza B viruses with the D197N NA substitution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".