MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2807411272 · doi:10.1654/1525-2647-85.1.13

Functional Morphology and Structural Variability in <i>Lernaeenicus</i> (Copepoda: Pennellidae) Parasitic on Teleost Fishes from the Northwest Atlantic Ocean

2018· article· en· W2807411272 on OpenAlexaff
W. E. Hogans

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative Parasitology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsGovernment of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMorphology (biology)CrustaceanParasite hostingEcologyZoologyFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The morphology of 3 species of Lernaeenicus: Lernaeenicus affixus, Lernaeenicus longiventris, and Lernaeenicus radiatus, mesoparasitic copepods of fishes from the Atlantic coast of North America, is documented. There was significant structural variability in the cephalothorax and holdfast horn complex on the anterior embedded end between individuals in all 3 species. The functional morphology of holdfast structures of the parasites was influenced by the requirements for adequate anchoring in host tissues and was related to the types of tissues and host species infected: attachment directly to bone by individual L. affixus produced lamellae and short, unbranched holdfasts; the hammer-shaped cephalothorax provided with short holdfasts exhibited by members of L. longiventris was found in hard, dense musculature; and elongate, dendritic holdfasts of specimens of L. radiatus were found in soft muscle. Based on morphological characteristics, L. longiventris, L. affixus, and L. radiatus are considered as separate and distinct species even though the latter 2 are similar in size and appendage structure and infect the same species and individual fish hosts. All 3 species are described from specimens in the collection of the United States National Museum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComparative ParasitologySame topicParasite Biology and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207