Human Connectome Project resting state fMRI data organized into 60 fine-scaled retinotopically organized regions in cortical areas V1, V2 and V3
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The data comprises 60 regions of interest (ROIs) from V1, V2, and V3 of the human visual cortex. Preprocessed data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) 900 subjects public data release were utilized: 220 subjects were randomly selected, each with 4 scans of resting state fMRI data. Given that these subjects did not have retinotopy scans performed, the visual areas were defined using an anatomical template from Benson et al. (2014). Visual areas from each hemisphere were further divided along dorsal-ventral lines into quadrants, resulting in 4 quadrants per subject. Within each quadrant, fine scaled ROIs were defined by subdividing each visual area into 5 regions according to eccentricity. These data may be useful for studying retinotopically organized functional connectivity in the visual cortex using the HCP 3 Tesla dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".