Experiências De Desenvolvimento Profissional Internacional De Professoras Mexicanas De Inglês No Canadá
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta investigacao interpreta as experiencias de participantes de um programa de desenvolvimento profissional internacional de professoras mexicanas de ingles, como monitoras de lingua espanhola no Canada. Devido ao carater de laissez-faire de tal programa e que as professoras mexicanas de ingles deviam ensinar espanhol e nao ingles, buscamos compreender o desenvolvimento das participantes enquanto elas viveram essas experiencias e identificar fatores curriculares relevantes na elaboracao do programa. Nossa trama narrativa, das experiencias das duas participantes, ecoa os contos A Princesa e a ervilha e Cinderela: o primeiro conto relata a busca pelo reconhecimento do merito autentico; o segundo e sobre o surgimento da habilidade e confianca inerentes. Fatores que influenciam no sucesso do programa incluem imersao cultural, horarios de trabalho, interacoes com professores locais, moradia familiar profissional, participacao ativa nas aulas, tempo para reflexao, papeis impostos, afirmacao de identidade profissional e (a falta de) atencao ao desenvolvimento linguistico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".