Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRAK. Diskusi dan kajian tentang arsitektur Islam sudah sedemikian banyak, terutama di kalangan akademisi dan praktisi. Sebagian diskusi tersebut memfokuskan pada aspek bentuk, langgam, peninggalan historis dan hal-hal lain yang bersifat fisik yang dianggap merupakan bagian dari kebudayaan umat muslim. Sementara itu sebagian kalangan merasa bahwa sesungguhnya Islam tidak cukup hanya diwujudkan dengan aspek fisik semata. Saat ini semakin berkembang wacana tentang arsitektur islam yang lebih mengedepankan nilai-nilai keislaman daripada tipologi fisik produk arsitektur. Di dalam pengertian ini, penulis menyebutnya sebagai arsitektur islami. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menggali sejauh mana perbedaan antara kedua pemikiran tentang arsitektur Islam dan arsitektur Islami, dan mengetahui apa sajakah aspek yang berpengaruh dalam perencanaan produk arsitektur yang islami, melalui kajian terhadap berbagai sumber berupa Al Qur’an dan hadits, buku, jurnal, dan beberapa artikel, di samping analisis pemikiran penulis sendiri. Dari kajian tersebut ditemukan bahwa bahasan tentang arsitektur islam sangat berbeda dengan arsitektur islami. Arsitektur islam menekankan tentang aspek fisik sebuah lingkungan binaan, sedangkan arsitektur islami lebih mengedepankan pada nilai-nilai keislaman yang bersumberkan pada Al Quran dan Hadits atau sunnah Rasulullah. Aspek dari arsitektur islami yang perlu untuk dikembangkan adalah efisensi, egaliter, privasi, kearifan lokal. Kata kunci : arsitektur islam, arsitektur islami, nilai Islam ABSTRACT. It has been regarded, there are so many discussion and study of Islamic architecture, particularly among academics and practitioners. Most of the discussion focuses on aspects of form, style, historical relics and other things that are considered physical is part of the culture of Muslims. Meanwhile, some people feel that the real Islam is not enough just realized with the physical aspect only. Currently, growing discourse about Islamic architecture which tends to emphasize Islamic values rather than physical typology of product architecture. In this matter, the author referred to it as Islamic Architecture. This paper is aimed to discover how extend to which the differences between two thinking about Islam Architecture and Islamic Architecture, and to find out the aspects which influence in Islamic Architecture product planning, through the study of various sources of the Qur'an and hadith, books, journals, and several articles, in addition to analysis of the author's own thoughts. From those studies it was found that a discussion of Islam architecture is very different from Islamic architecture. Islam architecture emphasizes the physical aspects of the built environment, while Islamic architecture is more advanced on Islamic values which root on Al Quran and hadith or sunnah of the Prophet. Aspects of Islamic architecture that need to be developed is efficiency, egalitarian, privacy and genius loci. Keywords : Islam Architecture, Islamic Architecture, Islamic values
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".