MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2807731348 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2018.2846264

Multiport Modular Multilevel Converter for DC Systems

2018· article· en· W2807731348 on OpenAlexafffund
Sunny Kung, Gregory J. Kish

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsConvertersModular designControl reconfigurationElectronic engineeringModularity (biology)EngineeringScalabilityNetwork topologyReliability (semiconductor)Power (physics)Computer scienceInterconnectionElectrical engineeringVoltageEmbedded systemTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiport HV DC-DC converters are required to facilitate future HVDC infrastructure with the ability to interconnect and manage power flow between multiple HVDC networks. Existing topologies offer limited modularity and scalability, making them difficult to implement in the fast-growing HVDC industry. In this paper, a multiport modular multilevel converter (MP-MMC) is proposed as the first truly modular multiport HV DC-DC converter. The MP-MMC is made up of multiple subconverters that can be controlled individually with de-centralized controllers, allowing easy reconfiguration and high reliability of the converter power circuit. The MP-MMC is compared with other prominent multiport HV DC-DC converters based on modularity, reliability, semiconductor effort, magnetics requirement, and fault-blocking performance. Operation and performance of the MP-MMC are verified by simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207