Bibliographic record
Abstract
Process engineering systems have become increasingly complex and more vulnerable to potential accidents. The risks posed by these systems are alarming and worrisome. The operation of these complex process engineering systems requires a high level of understanding both from the operational as well as the safety perspective. This study focuses on dynamic risk assessment and management of complex process engineering systems’ operations. To reduce risk posed by process systems, there is a need to develop process accident models capable of capturing system dynamics in real-time. This thesis presents a set of predictive process accident models developed over four years. It is prepared in manuscript style and consists of nine chapters, five of which are published in peer reviewed journals. A dynamic operational risk management tool for process systems is developed, considering evolving process conditions. The obvious advantage of the developed methodologies is that it dynamically captures the real time changes occurring in the process operations. The real time risk profile provided by the methodologies developed serve as performance indicator for operational decision making. The research has made contributions on the following topics: (a) process accident model considering dependency among contributory factors, (b) dynamic safety analysis of process systems using a nonlinear and non-sequential accident model, (c) dynamic failure analysis of process systems using principal component analysis and a Bayesian network, (d) dynamic failure analysis of process systems using a neural network and (e) an integrated approach for dynamic economic risk assessment of process systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".