MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2807786343 · doi:10.15760/nwjte.2013.11.1.4

Enhancing Understanding: Clarifying Teacher Mentor Roles in the

2013· article· en· W2807786343 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lorraine Beaudin

Bibliographic record

VenueNorthwest Journal of Teacher Education · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCollaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPracticumInternshipTeacher educationPedagogyPsychologyTeacher preparationOrientation (vector space)Medical educationMathematics educationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As more teacher preparation programs emerge in Alberta and as a significant numbers of teachers retire, there is an ongoing need for clearly communicating practicum roles and responsibilities among stakeholders, especially to new Teacher Mentors. This paper outlines the implementation of the University of Lethbridge, Faculty of Education’s Educational Partners Orientation Program (EPOP) and briefly outlines the importance of clarifying what it means to mentor pre-service teachers in their internships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.068
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.066
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0680.066
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.018
Scholarly communication0.0140.015
Open science0.0040.021
Research integrity0.0050.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorthwest Journal of Teacher EducationSame topicCollaborative Teaching and InclusionFrench-language works237,207