MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2807851282 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2018.2841889

Multivalued Neural Network Inverse Modeling and Applications to Microwave Filters

2018· article· en· W2807851282 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInverseArtificial neural networkInverse problemInverse functionComputer scienceAlgorithmSet (abstract data type)Matching (statistics)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysisGeometryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new technique for artificial neural network (ANN) inverse modeling and applications to microwave filters. In inverse modeling of a microwave component, the inputs to the model are electrical parameters such as S-parameters, and the outputs of the model are geometrical or physical parameters. Since the analytical formula of the inverse input-output relationship does not exist, the ANN becomes a logical choice, because it can be trained to learn from the data in inverse modeling. The main challenge of inverse modeling is the nonuniqueness problem. This problem in the ANN inverse modeling is that different training samples with the same or very similar input values have quite different (contradictory) output values (multivalued solutions). In this paper, we propose a multivalued neural network inverse modeling technique to associate a single set of electrical parameters with multiple sets of geometrical or physical parameters. One set of geometrical or physical parameters is called one value of our proposed inverse model. Our proposed multivalued neural network is structured to accommodate multiple values for the model output. We also propose a new training error function to focus on matching each training sample using only one value of our proposed inverse model, while other values are free and can be trained to match other contradictory samples. In this way, our proposed multivalued neural network can learn all the training data by automatically redirecting contradictory information into different values of the proposed inverse model. Therefore, our proposed technique can solve the nonuniqueness problem in a simpler and more automated way compared with the existing ANN inverse modeling techniques. This technique is illustrated by inverse modeling and parameter extraction of four microwave filter examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.824

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it