Buoyancy‐driven coastal current blocks ventilation of an anoxic fjord on the <scp>P</scp>acific coast of <scp>C</scp>anada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Shallow sills restrict the ventilation of deep coastal fjords. Dense oceanic water seaward of the sill and lower density water within the receiving basin are generally required for oxygenated water to cross the sill and descend deep into the fjord. Here we use concurrent 10 year time series from current meters in the fjord and on the continental shelf to examine ventilation of the 120 m deep, anoxic inner basin of Effingham Inlet on the west coast of Vancouver Island. Whereas density currents traverse the 40 m deep sill and flow into the inner basin at mid‐depth at quasi‐fortnightly tidal intervals, only five current intrusions descended to the bottom of the basin over the decade‐long measurement period. The deep intrusions had a mean (±SD) return interval of 1.75 (±1.33) years and induced bottom‐water changes that persisted for 1–2 months. We show that, in addition to conditions within the inlet, deep ventilation of the inner basin is dependent on a coordinated sequence of external processes: (1) the onset of upwelling winds along the outer coast; (2) reversal of the buoyancy‐driven coastal current that normally flows poleward over the inner shelf off Vancouver Island; and (3) reversal of the estuarine circulation in the channel connecting the inlet to the ocean. As the observed ventilation intervals are short compared to the decadal intervals derived from the spacing of “homogenites” (sedimentation sequences disrupted by intruding bottom currents), the use of homogenites as proxies for past upwelling conditions in the northeast Pacific may need to be reexamined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".