Case Study: Intra-Patient Heterogeneity of Aneurysmal Tissue Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Current recommendations for surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) rely on the assessment of aortic diameter as a marker for risk of rupture. The use of aortic size alone may overlook the role that vessel heterogeneity plays in aneurysmal progression and rupture risk. The aim of the current study was to investigate intra-patient heterogeneity of mechanical and fluid mechanical stresses on the aortic wall and wall tissue histopathology from tissue collected at the time of surgical repair. Methods Finite element analysis (FEA) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were used to predict the mechanical wall stress and the wall shear stress fields for a non-ruptured aneurysm two weeks prior to scheduled surgery. During open repair surgery one specimen partitioned into different regions was collected from the patient’s diseased aorta according to a pre-operative map. Histological analysis and mechanical testing were performed on the aortic samples and the results were compared with the predicted stresses. Results The preoperative simulations highlighted the presence of altered local hemodynamics particularly at the proximal segment of the left anterior area of the aneurysm. Results from the post-operative assessment on the surgical samples revealed a considerable heterogeneity throughout the aortic wall. There was a positive correlation between elastin fragmentation and collagen content in the media. The tensile tests demonstrated a good prediction of the locally varying constitutive model properties predicted using geometrical variables, i.e. wall thickness and thrombus thickness. Conclusions The observed large regional differences highlight the local response of the tissue to both mechanical and biological factors. Aortic size alone appears to be insufficient to characterize the large degree of heterogeneity in the aneurysmal wall. Local assessment of wall vulnerability may provide better risk of rupture predictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".