Structural Evolution of the Rifted Margin off Northern Labrador: The Role of Hyperextension and Magmatism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract High‐quality seismic reflection data from the offshore northern Labrador rifted margin allow imaging of the extended and rifted crust both along and across the continental margin and are described in conjunction with available seismic velocity and gravity data. The margin formed within cold, thick cratonic lithosphere. Both Archean continental basement and a discrete, undulating, high‐amplitude, deep reflection about 10 km below basement are observed. The deeper reflection can be correlated with the crust‐mantle boundary as measured on previous wide‐angle seismic data in the region. This reflection, termed here the L ‐reflection, appears to be the equivalent to other top‐mantle detachments found elsewhere on magma‐poor rifted margins. However, normal mantle velocities have been observed to lie just below the reflection, suggesting that it may not be related to the formation of weak serpentinized mantle. A high‐velocity and density zone occupies the outer shelf seaward of the L ‐reflection where basement is transparent, which may represent highly mafic crust or serpentinized mantle. A crustal reconstruction of this margin and its conjugate shows marked asymmetry, with a wider zone of crustal thinning on the Greenland margin. These crustal thinning profiles are comparable to those on other conjugate margins within cratonic lithosphere. While some of the attributes of this margin are those of a magma‐poor system, at the ocean‐continent transition, thick igneous crust created a magma‐rich zone in Paleocene time when a hot spot was active in the Davis Strait to the north. Thus, this margin exhibits characteristics of both magma‐rich and magma‐poor systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".