MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2808050077 · doi:10.4000/ifha.9146

Volker Leppin, Die fremde Reformation. Luthers mystische Wurzeln

2018· article· fr· W2808050077 on OpenAlexaff
Gérald Chaix

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans un premier temps, Volker Leppin brosse le tableau de la piété du Moyen Âge tardif. Au-delà de sa propre expérience, Luther la connaît par l’intermédiaire de son supérieur et confesseur, Johann von Staupitz, par sa lecture et son édition de la Théologie allemande de Johannes Tauler, mais aussi par sa propre réflexion sur les notions de pénitence, de repentir et d’indulgence (dont ne se satisfait précisément pas Tauler !). Il étudie ensuite le cheminement qui conduit de la théologie mysti...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne→Same topicReformation and Early Modern Christianity→French-language works237,207→