MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808061779

The effect of babies on mother’s labor supply by education and race

2013· book· en· W2808061779 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria de la Esperanza Juri

Bibliographic record

VenueScholars' Press eBooks · 2013
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Flexibility (engineering)Race (biology)Demographic economicsCensusLabour economicsWork (physics)DemographyPsychologyEconomicsGeographyPopulationSociologyGender studiesEngineeringManagement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book looks at how mother's education and race are important determinants of the size, pattern, and even the sign of the effect of young children on their mother's labor supply. Children less than three years old are one of the most important causes of interruptions and changes in women's labor supply. It extends over the USA over the last quarter of the 20th century, a period of time when the labor force participation of mothers with babies shows a higher growth rate than that of women with older children or without children. This study estimates different static labor supply models using the biggest annual survey conducted by the Bureau of the Census and analyzes the decision to work at the extensive and intensive margins as well as the distribution of hours of work. Although highly educated women have the highest labor force participation rate, and the highest number of worked hours when they have babies, they are the most affected by young children showing the greatest degree of flexibility to adjust the number of hours of work. The differences between black and white women are notorious both in the degree and sign of the response to the presence of babies and in the trend.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholars' Press eBooksSame topicGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsFrench-language works237,207