Impuissance et contre-transfert culturel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le contre-transfert culturel est un concept qui souligne la dimension socioculturelle, et donc collective, du contre-transfert. Dans ce texte, nous analysons, au moyen de cinq histoires cliniques presentees dans le cadre de seminaires de discussion de cas transculturels et interinstitutionnels menes a Montreal, Canada, les diverses formes que peut prendre le contre-transfert culturel pour des cliniciens en situation d’impasse therapeutique face a la prise en charge de familles migrantes. Nous examinons ensuite le role eventuel de ces seminaires dans la transformation de ce contre-transfert et dans la formulation de pistes permettant de relancer ou de soutenir le processus therapeutique. Les resultats indiquent que les seminaires transculturels et interinstitutionnels de discussion de cas facilitent un travail d’elaboration sur les representations collectives des cliniciens et que ce travail groupal permet de contenir et parfois de depasser certaines situations d’echec therapeutique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.054 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".