MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808194765 · doi:10.33423/jabe.v20i1.316

Business Intelligence: Oxymoron or a Big Data Technique?

2018· article· en· W2808194765 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael Latta

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Business and Economics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOxymoronBusiness analyticsBusiness intelligenceSWOT analysisInternshipBig dataGraduation (instrument)Business analysisAnalytical skillAnalyticsIntelligence analysisKnowledge managementData sciencePsychologyComputer scienceBusinessMedical educationBusiness modelMarketingEngineeringMathematics educationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Business education current practice prepares students for analysis with tools such as Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunity, and Threats (SWOT Analysis). Predictive Analytics and Data Science coupled with Big Data are popular. As faculty show students how to help business organizations solve real-world problems with these advanced analysis tools, they need to understand how to integrate the softer side of Business Intelligence into business analysis practice. These softer skills include Knowledge from Education, Practical IQ, Emotional IQ and Interpersonal IQ. Taken together they define Business Intelligence which is highly useful in both academic assignments like internships and on the job after graduation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.034
Scholarly communication0.0150.041
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Business and EconomicsSame topicBig Data and Business IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207