MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808198431

Folk schools: slow education for fast times

2017· dissertation· en· W2808198431 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Methods and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationPedagogyPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Folk schools are an enduring vision of nineteenth-century Danish philosopher Nikolai Severin Grundtvig. These schools for life offer non-competitive, non-vocational, residential, youth and adult education. This thesis explores the historical and contemporary folk schools of the United States and Canada, addressing a lack of scholarly writing on North American folk schools. It is framed by the question, ?What is the past and present state of folk schooling in the United States and Canada with respect to people, pedagogy, philosophy, and place; and what opportunities exist for folk schools to enact social change in today?s world??
\nFirst I address the context from which this research arises: the history of folk schools. A review of the literature examines folk schools in national struggles for identity, and the lasting impacts of folk schooling in Scandinavia and in America. In the United States, the effect of folk schooling is apparent in contributions to the Craft Revival, Labour, and Civil Rights movements. The literature review also creates scholarly consensus around what constitutes a folk school.
\nI then develop an analysis of contemporary folk schools. Guided by methodologies of content analysis and comparative research, this qualitative, humanities-oriented research uses a historical and cultural lens for interpreting current web-based data and literature on folk schooling. I discuss contemporary North American folk schools and analyze them with respect to place, people, pedagogy, and philosophy. For the purpose of comparative content analysis, I examine folk schooling in five distinct yet related categories: The Originals, The Spiritual Schools, The (Quasi)State and Institutional Schools, The Grassroots Schools, and The Roving Schools. I then analyze modern folk schools as a unified branch of alternative, youth and adult education. In closing, I look to the future of folk schooling as sites of personal and social transformation, and suggest opportunities for living work that arise in response to this research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it