MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808258154 · doi:10.1109/mcom.2018.1700458

Cloud Miracles: Heterogeneous Cloud RAN for Fair Coexistence of LTE-U and Wi-Fi in Ultra Dense 5G Networks

2018· article· en· W2808258154 on OpenAlexaff
Zhenyu Zhou, Shahid Mumtaz, Kazi Mohammed Saidul Huq, Anwer Al‐Dulaimi, Kishor Chandra, Jonathan Rodriquez

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Magazine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsExfo Electro-Optical Engineering (Canada)
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkCloud computingNetwork packetSpectrum managementRadio access networkRanLeverage (statistics)FemtocellLTE AdvancedAir interfaceTelecommunicationsWirelessTelecommunications linkCognitive radioBase stationMobile stationOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to a tremendous increase in mobile traffic, mobile operators have started to restructure their networks to offload their traffic in the unlicensed bands. The 3GPP new technologies of LAA and LTE-U employ an unlicensed radio interface that operates over the 5 GHz unlicensed band to leverage the radio resources for operators' transmissions. 5G relies on spectrum extension using multi-radio interfaces accessing multiple bands such as LAA and LTE-U. However, the physical and MAC layer designs for LTE-based systems have a significant impact on Wi-Fi performance to maintain a fair share of unlicensed spectrum. Therefore, this article proposes a coexistence mechanism that manages backoff for LTE-U and Wi-Fi when accessing the 5 GHz band. The new mechanism allocates certain amounts of packets to both technologies through a new interface that resides in a heterogeneous cloud RAN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications MagazineSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207