Radio parlée, élections et démocratie.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Centre d'étude s'est intéressé au rôle qu'ont joué les deux radios privées de format parlé de Québec lors des élections à la mairie à l'automne 2007. Nous avons analysé ce que CHOI et le 93,3 ont proposé à leurs nombreux auditeurs pendant les trois semaines officielles de cette campagne électorale. Nos travaux montrent clairement que les deux stations de Québec n’ont pas respecté les consignes du CRTC ni les normes qu’on retrouve dans le Code de déontologie de l’Association canadienne des radiodiffuseurs, auquel elles ont pourtant adhéré. Elles n’ont pas traité de manière équitable la candidate du RMQ, Ann Bourget. Elles n’ont pas assuré une couverture « complète, juste et appropriée » de cette campagne à la mairie de Québec. Au contraire, des animateurs se sont servis abusivement du pouvoir que leur confère l’accès quotidien aux micros de stations très écoutées, et les dirigeants de ces stations ont laissé faire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".