MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808333528

Slovenian Companies and Circular Economy

2018· article· en· W2808333528 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Miroslav Rebernik, Karin Širec

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Maribor Press · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSustainable Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEurosQuarter (Canadian coin)BusinessEuropean unionRetail tradeValue (mathematics)EconomyCommerceInternational tradeEconomicsGeographyHumanities
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we first analysed all companies and entrepreneurs in Slovenia for the year 2016, then we compared for the year 2015 or 2014 key data of Slovenia and EU-28 or individual member states in the non-financial business economy (the activities of industry, distributive trades and services). In Slovenia, in 2016 124,058 businesses employed 543,371 people. The majority of businesses (nearly one fifth) operated in the wholesale and retail trade; maintenance and repair of motor vehicles. Likewise, in the EU-28 in 2015 more than a quarter of businesses (26.4% or 6.2 million) was active in the wholesale and retail trade; maintenance and repair of motor vehicles. This activity employed the most people, almost a quarter (33.1 million). In the EU-28 as well as in Slovenia, the majority of value added was created by manufacturing businesses. The average value added per person employed for the aggregated activities of the EU-28 in the year 2015 amounted to 51,086 euros, while in Slovenia 32,694 euros (next to 40% less), the highest was in Ireland (135,200 euros), while the lowest in Bulgaria (12,040 euros).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.163
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Maribor PressSame topicSustainable Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207