MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808349928 · doi:10.1109/isps.2018.8379018

Towards privacy and ownership preserving of outsourced health data in IoT-cloud context

2018· preprint· en· W2808349928 on OpenAlexaff
Youcef Ould-Yahia, Samia Bouzefrane, Hanifa Boucheneb

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutsourcingEncryptionComputer scienceCloud computingComputer securityClient-side encryptionAccess controlAttribute-based encryptionService providerContext (archaeology)Information privacyService (business)On-the-fly encryptionPublic-key cryptographyBusinessOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel data-owner centric privacy model for in-home-monitoring applications, that implements a promising attribute-based encryption (ABE) to reinforce the data-owner access control and the security of anonymous data access. This proposed protocol avoids threats from curious cloud service providers. Unlike other schemes that implement ABE by outsourcing the heavy computational tasks such as encryption and decryption processes, we propose a framework in which we externalize the complete ABE-encryption algorithms to avoid complex outsourcing process and use well know efficient symmetric encryption in constrained devices. We have performed an experimental analysis to show how much gain allows such offloading.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207