Design and implementation of a faculty-student engagement programme in an entry-to-practice Doctor of Pharmacy programme
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The importance of fostering connections between faculty and students is well documented in the literature. The University of British Columbia's Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Faculty) launched a Faculty- Student Engagement Programme (FSEP) to cultivate links between faculty and students. Aim: To describe the design, implementation, and outcomes of the FSEP for first-year students in a Doctor of Pharmacy Programme. Methods: Forty-two volunteer faculty were matched with 224 students in groups of five or six. Evaluation surveys were distributed to faculty and students. Additional in-person feedback was obtained from students. Results: In-person feedback was obtained from 79% (n=174) of students. Surveys were completed by 90% (n=38) of faculty and 25% (n=56) of students. Eighty percent of faculty agreed that the FSEP was a valuable initiative. Seventy- seven percent of students recommended that the Faculty continue to offer the FSEP. Conclusion: The FSEP was positively evaluated by faculty and students and it could be emulated at other institutions interested in enhancing the student experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it