MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808372144 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.5326

Management of chronic scrotal content pain

2018· review· en· W2808372144 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMale Reproductive Health Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialMedicineChronic painMultimodal therapyNeuropathic painPhysical therapyPsychiatrySurgeryAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CSP is a common, complex, yet poorly understood condition that can be frustrating for both patients and urologists. Thorough evaluation of the patient is important, and it is important to recognize the psychosocial implications of pain. Multimodal treatment approaches using lifestyle measures, physical therapy, and psychotherapy may empower patients and provide useful tools for coping with this condition. Neuropathic medications are promising alternatives to opioid analgesics for chronic pain conditions. There are promising surgical options emerging for CSP. An algorithm of conservative and medical management of idiopathic CSP is shown in Fig. 1. Open in a separate window Fig. 1 Conservative and medical management of idiopathic chronic scrotal pain. TCA: tricyclic antidepressant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it