Hyperparameter-free optimizer of stochastic gradient descent that incorporates unit correction and moment estimation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT In the deep learning era, stochastic gradient descent is the most common method used for optimizing neural network parameters. Among the various mathematical optimization methods, the gradient descent method is the most naive. Adjustment of learning rate is necessary for quick convergence, which is normally done manually with gradient descent. Many optimizers have been developed to control the learning rate and increase convergence speed. Generally, these optimizers adjust the learning rate automatically in response to learning status. These optimizers were gradually improved by incorporating the effective aspects of earlier methods. In this study, we developed a new optimizer: YamAdam. Our optimizer is based on Adam, which utilizes the first and second moments of previous gradients. In addition to the moment estimation system, we incorporated an advantageous part of AdaDelta, namely a unit correction system, into YamAdam. According to benchmark tests on some common datasets, our optimizer showed similar or faster convergent performance compared to the existing methods. YamAdam is an option as an alternative optimizer for deep learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it