MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808421368 · doi:10.1109/twc.2018.2845410

Uplink Access Protocol in IEEE 802.11ac

2018· article· en· W2808421368 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Zulfiker Ali, Jelena Mišić, Vojislav B. Mišić

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceTelecommunications linkComputer networkSubcarrierThroughputTransmission (telecommunications)Real-time computingChannel (broadcasting)Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexingWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The IEEE 802.11ac amendment enhances WLAN throughput by exploiting the spatial diversity of the antennas in a multi-user multi-input multi-output downlink transmission. Still, network resources remain under-utilized in uplink transmission due to single-user communication. In this paper, we propose an access point-controlled MAC protocol (A-MAC) that enables simultaneous transmissions from multiple STAs in uplink. The protocol uses the EDCA channel access technique to initiate multi-user transmission and the OFDMA method to transmit multiple RTSs simultaneously. It also introduces the explicit channel sounding technique by using dedicated OFDM subcarrier blocks for each user. Performance measurement shows that network throughput of the A-MAC is 150% higher than that of a single uplink transmission, thanks to the availability of concurrent multiple RTS transmissions in the uplink. The proposed protocol shortens the backoff time by up to 50% for all traffic categories due to concurrent multiple transmissions and thus enhances the battery life of the nodes. We observe that although the smaller backoff window of high-priority traffic category enhances the network throughput, higher intensity of high-priority traffic drives the network faster to saturation. Furthermore, better network stability and fairness among different traffic categories can be achieved when the dominant traffic has low priority.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0060.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207