Using dynamic clamp to quantify pathological changes in the excitability of primary somatosensory neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
KEY POINTS: Primary somatosensory neurons normally respond to somatic depolarization with transient spiking but can switch to repetitive spiking under pathological conditions. This switch in spiking pattern reflects a qualitative change in spike initiation dynamics and contributes to the hyperexcitability associated with chronic pain. Neurons can be converted to repetitive spiking by adding a virtual conductance using dynamic clamp. By titrating the conductance to determine how much must be added to cause repetitive spiking, we found that small cells are more susceptible to switching (i.e. required less added conductance) than medium-large cells. By measuring how much less conductance is required to cause repetitive spiking when dynamic clamp was combined with other pathomimetic manipulations (e.g. application of inflammatory mediators), we measured how much each manipulation facilitated repetitive spiking. Our results suggest that many pathological factors facilitate repetitive spiking but that the switch to repetitive spiking requires the cumulative effect of many co-occurring factors. ABSTRACT: Primary somatosensory neurons become hyperexcitable in many chronic pain conditions. Hyperexcitability can include a switch from transient to repetitive spiking during sustained somatic depolarization. This switch results from diverse pathological processes that impact ion channel expression or function. Because multiple pathological processes co-occur, isolating how much each contributes to switching the spiking pattern is difficult. Our approach to this challenge involves adding a virtual sodium conductance via dynamic clamp. The magnitude of that conductance was titrated to determine the minimum required to enable rheobasic stimulation to evoke repetitive spiking. The minimum required conductance, termed g¯ Na ∗, was re-measured before and during manipulations designed to model various pathological processes in vitro. The reduction in g¯ Na ∗ caused by each pathomimetic manipulation reflects how much the modelled process contributes to switching the spiking pattern. We found that elevating extracellular potassium or applying inflammatory mediators reduced g¯ Na ∗ whereas direct hyperpolarization had no effect. Inflammatory mediators reduced g¯ Na ∗ more in medium-large (>30 μm diameter) neurons than in small (⩽30 μm diameter) neurons, but had equivalent effects in cutaneous and muscle afferents. The repetitive spiking induced by dynamic clamp was also found to differ between small and medium-large neurons, thus revealing latent differences in adaptation. Our study demonstrates a novel way to determine to what extent individual pathological factors facilitate repetitive spiking. Our results suggest that most factors facilitate but do not cause repetitive spiking on their own, and, therefore, that a switch to repetitive spiking results from the cumulative effect of many co-occurring factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".