MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2808516514

Characterization of present biological conditions in the intertidal community across Howe Sound, British Columbia

2018· article· en· W2808516514 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fabiola Chimsom Ukah

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntertidal zoneSound (geography)OceanographyEcologyGeographyEnvironmental scienceBiologyGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Howe Sound is a Pacific Northwest fjord located north of Vancouver, British Columbia.This fjord has been impacted by effluents from several industries including two pulp mills and a copper mine.After Environment Canada undertook more stringent enforcement on environmental standards in the 1980s, the Britannia copper mine and the Woodfibre pulp and paper mill were shut down.Historical data from the intertidal community indicate that recovery of the ecosystems in these areas has been minimal, particularly at sites in close proximity to industrial activities.The goal of this study was to begin a characterization of several present biological conditions in the intertidal community across Howe Sound.Six sites were selected and grouped based on degree of exposure to industrial activities.High exposure sites included Britannia Beach, Darrell Bay and Port Mellon, while moderate exposure sites included Porteau Cove and Lions Bay.Chaster bay was selected as a reference site for this study.Two biomarkers of exposure; ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) and metallothionein (MT) were measured in mussels to assess the availability of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and metals at these sites.When compared to the Chaster Bay reference site, EROD activity was significantly higher in mussels collected from the two high exposure sites (Britannia Beach (~2.1 increase) and Port Mellon (~1.5 increase)) and the two moderate exposure sites (Porteau Cove (~1.8 increase) and Lions Bay (~1.6 increase).MT levels were significantly higher in mussels from the Britannia Beach (~4.2 increase), Darrell Bay (~2.8 increase) and Porteau Cove (~2.4 increase).Results from another ecological bioindicator (giant kelp) showed that germination rates were significantly lower at Lions Bay, Port Mellon and Darrel Bay (> 60% reduction compared to the reference site).A 16% reduction in germination rate was also noted for Britannia Beach.Germination tube length were only found to be significantly reduced at Lions Bay (~20 % decrease), Darrell Bay (~37% decrease) and Britannia Beach (~10% decrease).Finally, in an intertidal community assessment using species richness as an index, Chaster Bay contributed 39.94% to the total species richness, a range of 17.78% -19.02% for moderate exposure sites and 4.50% -12.79% for the high exposure sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSummit (Simon Fraser University)→Same topicMarine Biology and Ecology Research→French-language works237,207→