Therapeutic potential of JAK/STAT pathway modulation in mood disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Convergent evidence demonstrates that immune dysfunction (e.g. chronic low-grade inflammatory activation) plays an important role in the development and progression of mood disorders. The Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathway is a pleiotropic cellular cascade that transduces numerous signals, including signals from the release of cytokines and growth factors. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway is involved in mediating several functions of the central nervous system, including neurogenesis, synaptic plasticity, gliogenesis, and microglial activation, all of which have been implicated in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. In addition, the antidepressant actions of current treatments have been shown to be mediated by JAK/STAT-dependent mechanisms. To date, two JAK inhibitors (JAKinibs) have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and are primarily indicated for the treatment of inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis. Indirect evidence from studies in populations with inflammatory conditions indicates that JAKinibs significantly improve measures of mood and quality of life. There is also direct evidence from studies in populations with depressive disorders, suggesting that JAK/STAT pathways may be involved in the pathophysiology of depression and that the inhibition of specific JAK/STAT pathways (i.e. via JAKinibs) may be a promising novel treatment for depressive disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".