MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808535870 · doi:10.1016/s1359-6128(18)30133-2

Fluid Handling Industry Update: M&A Activity

2018· article· en· W2808535870 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas E Haan

Bibliographic record

VenuePump Industry Analyst · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaceQuarter (Canadian coin)BusinessCommerceHistoryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fluid handling industry M&A activity has started 2018 at near record pace. Through April 2018 there have been 30 transactions announced, 26 of those were in the first quarter of the year. The only other quarter that has had that level of volume in the last eight years was Q3 2014 when there were 27 transactions announced. That level of activity helped make 2014 a record year with 76 transactions. January was by far the most active month we have seen with 14 transactions. This could be an indication that there were some transactions that were held until after the close of 2017 to take advantage of the tax law change for 2018. The pace of activity has slowed with nine transactions in February and three each in March and April, so despite the fast start we may not be on the way to a record-breaking year.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePump Industry AnalystSame topicMarine and Offshore Engineering StudiesFrench-language works237,207