Multiple Object Activity Identification Using RFIDs: A Multipath-Aware Deep Learning Solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RFID-based human activity identification has become a key component in today's Internet-of-Things applications. State-of-the-art solutions mostly focus on the simple scenario with a single person in the open space. Extension to the more realistic realworld scenarios with multiple persons however is non-trivial. Given the much richer interactions among them, the backscattered signals will inevitably mixed, obscuring the information of individual activities. This is further complicated with multi-path in a common indoor environment. In this paper, we however argue that, though often considered harmful, the rich interactions combined with multi-path indeed offer more observable data. After careful processing the raw signals, critical information about the activities can be unveiled through modern learning tools. We present M2AI, which for the first time accommodates both multi-path and multi-object for activity identification. M2AI incorporates a phase calibration mechanism to automatically eliminate the frequency hopping offsets, and a novel decoupling mechanism for the periodogram and pseduospectrum in the raw signal mixture. The refined data are then fed into an advanced deep-learning engine that integrates a Convolutional Neural Network and a Long Short Term Memory network, which examines both spatial and temporal information in realtime for activity identification. Our M2AI is readily deployable using off-the-shelf RFID readers. We have implemented an M2AI prototype with Impinj UHF passive tags and a Speedway R420 reader. Experiments with multiple objects in a multipath-rich indoor environments report an activity identification accuracy of 97%, a significant gain (27%) over state-of-art solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".