MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808615169 · doi:10.1109/radar.2018.8378699

Hybrid spread spectrum orthogonal waveforms for MIMO radar

2018· article· en· W2808615169 on OpenAlexaff
Hossein Chahrour, Sreeraman Rajan, Richard M. Dansereau, Bhashyam Balaji

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonalityComputer scienceAlgorithmAmbiguity functionMIMORadarNarrowbandWaveformElectronic engineeringSpread spectrumContext (archaeology)Pulse repetition frequencyTelecommunicationsMathematicsEngineeringCode division multiple access

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In multiple input multiple output (MIMO) radar systems, choosing a proper orthogonal waveform is a critical task. A new hybrid spread spectrum (HSS) technique is proposed to maintain orthogonality at the transmit and receive ends. The HSS technique is a combination of direct-sequence spreading and frequency hopping schemes. In the context of MIMO radar, the transmitted signals are first spread using Hadamard-Walsh orthogonal codes and in every pulse repetition period, each signal hops to a different center frequency. The transmitted HSS signals are orthogonal in frequency and code domains. Simulation results show that the proposed HSS technique can achieve sharper auto ambiguity response and lower sidelobe cross ambiguity response with a gain of over 10 dB and better probability of detection in comparison with frequency orthogonality technique. The proposed HSS technique has the potential to resolve closely spaced targets and provide better immunity against narrowband interferences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadar Systems and Signal ProcessingFrench-language works237,207