Loss of water from protonated polyglycines: interconversion and dissociation of the product imidazolone ions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Collision-induced dissociation of isotopically labelled protonated pentaglycine produced two abundant [b5]+ ions, the products of the loss of water from the first and second amide groups, labelled [b5]+I and [b5]+II. IRMPD spectroscopy and DFT calculations show that these two [b5]+ ions feature N1-protonated 3,5-dihydro-4H-imidazol-4-one structures. 15N-Labelling established that some interconversion occurs between these two ions but dissociations are preferred. For both ions, DFT calculations show that the barrier to interconversion is slightly higher than those to dissociation. Dehydration of protonated hexaglycine produced three imidazolone ions. Ions [b6]+I and [b6]+II exhibit analogous CID spectra to those from [b5]+I and [b5]+II; however, the spectrum of the [b6]+III ion was dramatically different, showing losses predominantly of a further water molecule or cleavage of the second amide bond to give the glycyloxazolone (a deprotonated [b2]+ ion, labelled GlyGlyox (114 Da)) from the N-terminus. Protonated polyglycines [Glyn + H]+, where n = 7-9, all readily lose at least one water molecule. The corresponding [bn]+ ions lose either a further water molecule, an oxazolone from the N-terminus or a truncated peptide from the C-terminus. The number of amino acid residues in the latter two eliminated neutral molecules provides insight into the location of the imidazolone in the peptide chain and which oxygen was lost in the initial dehydration reaction. From this analysis, it appears that water loss from the longer protonated polyglycines is predominantly from the central residues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".