MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808648506 · doi:10.36829/63cts.v4i2.517

Sensores electrónicos aplicados a la Ingeniería Civil (módulo de electrónica)

2017· article· es· W2808648506 on OpenAlexaff
Antonio E. Navas-Contreras

Bibliographic record

VenueCiencia Tecnologí­a y Salud · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicKnowledge Societies in the 21st Century
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Se trabajaron tres proyectos con el apoyo de Cementos Progreso y la Coordinadorea Nacional para la Reducción de Desastres (Conred): (1) Mejoramiento del sistema de monitoreo del nivel de ríos que utiliza Conred. Se desarrolló un sistema electrónico encargado de registrar el cambio de nivel del río y enviar automáticamente un mensaje de texto preventivo, mediante un módulo GSM, cuando el río alcance un nivel de peligro. (2). Medición de temperatura del concreto para determinar su grado de madurez, se utilizaron termocúplas tipo K modelo DS18B20 introducidas dentro del bloque de concreto a analizar, registrando el cambio de temperatura. Se utilizó un ordenador de placa, Raspberry-Pi, para almacenar los datos del cambio de temperatura, para luego enviar un informe diario por correo electrónico. Se determinó el índice de madurez del concreto analizado y se construyó una gráfica de temperatura-resistencia, para predecir la resistencia final aproximada que alcanza a los 28 días. (3). Análisis de deformaciones internas y deflexiones en losas convencionales de pavimentación. Para analizar las deformaciones internas que dichas losas experimentan con el paso del tránsito vehicular, se utilizaron galgas extensiométricas tipo PML-60-2LT. La deflexión de las losas se midió con un reloj comparador y una cámara web, para tomar una fotografía al momento de que pase un vehículo sobre la losa. Las galgas extensiométricas se conectaron a un Raspberry Pi para procesar y almacenar los datos, y enviar un informe diario por correo electrónico.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCiencia Tecnologí­a y SaludSame topicKnowledge Societies in the 21st CenturyFrench-language works237,207