Bibliographic record
Abstract
Virginie Despentes, dont le premier livre a été publié en 1993, est reconnue comme l’une des représentantes majeures d’une nouvelle orientation de la littérature féminine. Cet article analyse deux aspects de la réflexion de Despentes sur la figure du personnage public de l’écrivain : il montre, d’une part, que ses textes théoriques comme ses fictions dénoncent la réception critique, en France, d’une femme qui écrit et qui crée. D’autre part, il met en lumière, à l’heure de la domination de l’autofiction sur la littérature française, l’approche différente du moi et du sujet entreprise dans ses textes. C’est à partir d’une réflexion sur l’élaboration sociale du féminin et de la valeur « travail », qui ne se limite pas à l’oeuvre de l’écrivain, que Despentes repense la teneur de la sociabilité, le diagnostic d’une décomposition sociale n’étant pas pour elle seulement à critiquer, mais à mettre en oeuvre autrement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".