MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808671982 · doi:10.36829/63cts.v4i2.513

Producción y descomposición de hojarasca en el bosque natural de Cayo Quemado, Livingston, Izabal, Guatemala

2017· article· es· W2808671982 on OpenAlexaff
Eddi A Vanegas-Chacón, Andrea M. Smith-López, Jylian O. Hernandez-Soto

Bibliographic record

VenueCiencia Tecnologí­a y Salud · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesRhizophora mangleForestryBiologyArtGeographyEcologyMangrove

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los bosques naturales de los sistemas marino costeros son importantes por los bienes y servicios ambientales que prestan. Sin embargo, en la Costa Atlántica del país son vulnerables a múltiples amenazas. Como parte de un inventario de carbono del bosque natural Cayo Quemado, se cuantificó la producción y descomposición de hojarasca de las especies vegetales predominantes por unidad de área: Mangle rojo (Rhizophora mangle) 38.14%, zapotón (Pachira aquatica) 19.07%, cahue (Pterocarpus officinalis) 18.56% y anonillo (Rollinia pittieri) 7.22%. En bloques de 30 x 30 m, fueron colocadas en forma aleatoria trampas de 2 x 2 m, y bolsas de descomposición con 200 g de hojarasca fresca, con tres repeticiones, con lecturas cada 30 días. Se concluye que el mangle rojo aportó 0.6015, el zapotón 0.2701, el cahué 0.1836 y el anonillo 0.1119 para un total de 1.1671 MgC/ha, equivalentes a 4.28 MgCO2/ha. Así mismo, se determinó que después de cinco meses de descomposición la masa seca remanente fue de cahué (47.9%), zapotón (40.94%), mangle (38.86%) y anonillo (30.41%) en base a peso seco. El rol de las especies vegetales asociadas a los manglares es de suma importancia por su naturaleza recalcitrante y preservación del Cayo Quemado per se.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCiencia Tecnologí­a y SaludSame topicMarine and coastal plant biologyFrench-language works237,207