MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808684388 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-3627-7_21

Making It All Work

2018· book-chapter· en· W2808684388 on OpenAlexaff
Morey J. Haber, Brad Hibbert

Bibliographic record

VenueApress eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation and Cyber Security
Canadian institutionsNorthern Ontario Academic Medicine Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceComputer securityWork (physics)SoftwareMobile deviceWorld Wide WebEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The evolution of network computing environments – including the increased use of mobile, cloud, and virtual infrastructure – has created a continuous stream of new attack vectors for adversaries to prey on. Regardless of the tactics used, most breaches comprise some exploitation of software vulnerabilities or system configuration settings. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0140.016
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1120.098

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApress eBooksSame topicInformation and Cyber SecurityFrench-language works237,207