MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808695324

Updating the Canadian Standards Association Offshore Structures Code

2004· article· en· W2808695324 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Thomas G. Brown, Russell C. Grant

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssociation (psychology)Submarine pipelineCode (set theory)Computer scienceGeologyProgramming languageOceanographySet (abstract data type)Psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1999 the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) embarked on an initiative to both revise the existing Offshore Standards that were adopted in the early 1990s and move forward to harmonize them with the ISO Offshore Structures Code. The updating process followed a consensus approach with care taken to ensure that due process was followed. Changes to CSA S471 General Requirements, Design Criteria, the Environment, and Loads, which sets the overall principles of the CSA Offshore Structures Code, were small, but there has been extensive revision of the Annex E Determination of ice loads as well as the addition of two new annexes, Annex H Accidental loads and Annex I Ice accretion on offshore structures. The revised CSA Code sets a basis for harmonization with the ISO Offshore Structures Code.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207