MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808723863 · doi:10.1109/tcst.2018.2842038

State-of-Charge Estimation Using an EKF-Based Adaptive Observer

2018· article· en· W2808723863 on OpenAlexaff
Sepideh Afshar, Kirsten Morris, Amir Khajepour

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersGeneral Motors Corporation
KeywordsState of chargeExtended Kalman filterEstimatorKalman filterLithium iron phosphateBattery (electricity)Observer (physics)Control theory (sociology)State variableComputer scienceControl engineeringEngineeringMathematicsPhysicsThermodynamicsArtificial intelligencePower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithium-ion batteries are used to store energy in electric vehicles. State of charge (SOC) is an important quantity of the battery cells that need to be estimated using limited measurements. In this paper, SOC estimation via an electrochemical model, a physics-based model, is considered. For lithium iron phosphate cells, a variable solid-state diffusivity model provides significantly more accuracy, but this complicates the model further. A previously obtained, simplified but still a physics-based model is used in this paper. An extended Kalman filter (KF)-based adaptive observer is designed via a low-order approximation of this electrochemical model. The predictions of the estimator are compared with the experimental data in simulations. The simulations are efficient and more accurate than a standard KF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Control Systems TechnologySame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207